Alliance for the Western Rockies
Image from Sierraclub.org: Affectionate Grey Wolves. | Photo by RamiroMarquezPhotos/iStock
The article discusses recent lawsuits filed by conservation groups against the Biden administration, challenging the decision not to reinstate Endangered Species Act (ESA) protections for wolves in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, and parts of Washington and Oregon. Key points include:
Over a dozen wildlife organizations filed two separate lawsuits in response to increased wolf killings in these states.
The groups argue that current state management practices are based on hostility towards wolves rather than scientific evidence.
There's disagreement over the definition of "recovery" and the minimum number of wolves needed for a healthy population.
Conservation groups claim that states are using questionable methods to overcount wolf populations, leading to overly permissive hunting policies.
Critics argue that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is ignoring the effects of excessive killing on wolf genetic health and population connectivity.
State policies in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming allow controversial wolf hunting methods, including snares, night vision, aerial gunning, and bounties.
Researchers like Bob Crabtree and Scott Creel have criticized the models used to estimate wolf populations in these states.
There are concerns about genetic diversity and long-term survival of wolf populations at current numbers.
Incidents of wolf poaching and animal cruelty have been reported, with some perpetrators facing minimal consequences.
The lawsuits aim to restore federal protections for wolves in these states to ensure their long-term survival and genetic health.
